Webinar Playback ▶▶▶

How One Medtech Company Eliminated Manual Work & Improved Training Compliance

20-50%

training delinquency rate before switching to Propel's automated eQMS

4-8 hours

saved per quiz using Propel's AI quiz generator instead of manual creation

3 days

the reporting window for serious injury complaints like device-related adverse events

Quick Overview

Hear directly from a veteran quality leader in this Propel Industry Spotlight webinar on fixing training delinquency and manual complaint handling in medical device quality systems. The session reveals that training delinquency rates of 20 to 50% dropped dramatically after implementing Propel's eQMS, driven by automated manager and quality escalation for overdue training. It also covers how integrating Salesforce complaint intake directly into Propel's eQMS eliminated manual transcription errors on serial numbers, phone numbers, and patient data, which previously caused reporting delays on time-sensitive FDA complaint investigations. The speaker explains how Propel's AI quiz generator removes hours of manual work building compliant training assessments and how built-in decision trees speed MDR reportability determinations.

Key Takeaways

Automated escalation to managers and quality is the single biggest fix for chronic training delinquency.
Manual chasing of overdue training wasted hours of staff time and never solved the problem long term. Automatic escalation to managers, then quality, when training lapses keeps compliance on track without constant follow-up.
Direct complaint intake integration eliminates transcription errors on critical patient and product data.
Manually re-entering serial numbers, phone numbers, and patient information from a CRM into a complaint record creates real risk of errors that can delay time-sensitive FDA reportability decisions. Pulling intake data directly into the complaint record removes that risk entirely.
An AI quiz generator removes one of the most tedious parts of a compliant training program.
Building quizzes that meet FDA expectations for GMP training, typically five to ten meaningful questions, used to take hours per course. Generating them automatically and mapping them to the latest released document revision frees quality teams to focus on higher value work.
Annual review of job descriptions, training plans, and competency assessments prevents common audit findings.
Mismatched titles and training records are a frequent audit observation. Reviewing job descriptions and training assignments annually, with manager sign-off, keeps records aligned with actual roles as people are promoted, leave, or shift responsibilities.
Built-in decision trees speed up MDR and reportability determinations and reduce risk of missed deadlines.
Embedding reportability logic directly into the complaint workflow, rather than using a separate form, shortens the time needed to decide whether an event must be reported to the FDA, which matters given tight three-day windows for serious injury events.
Linking complaints, CAPAs, and health risk assessments together creates a stronger audit trail.
When a complaint, CAPA, and health risk assessment are related records rather than separate systems, auditors can trace from any one of them to the others instantly, which helps teams anticipate and answer audit questions proactively.
A flexible, configurable eQMS gets full team adoption in a way rigid legacy systems rarely achieve.
After implementing multiple quality systems across her career, the speaker notes this was the first time an entire team adopted a system without resistance to tasks like engineering change orders, crediting configurable workflows that match how the business actually works.
Learn More
See how Propel's cloud-native QMS turns the FDA's new QMSR into a smooth transition instead of a scramble, with training and documentation built to evolve as regulations change.
learn more